The Dharma, sutras, and commentarial interpretations of interest to American Buddhists of all traditions with news that not only informs but transforms. Emphasis on meditation, enlightenment, karma, social evolution, and nonharming.
(To contact us, leave a comment marked "private").
Are guys who make compilation videos dimrods (dimwitted nimrods)?The video clips are astounding. What to make of them? Who found them and put them together? Bryce just sits there barely saying anything, as if he's watching someone else's compiled content. What does LayedBakDFR do but minimal commentary? "Hey, let me know in the comments." How this content is conjoined with these commentators is beyond us. Everyone is a part-time hip hop wannabe rap star surfing the internet by day?
The creepiest TikToks on the internet: disturbing discoveries
(BryceIsRite) May 7, 2024: Prepare to be captivated and chilled as we dive into the deepest darkest corners of TikTok. Join us in unraveling the creepiest videos that reveal spinetingling and unsettling discoveries. Get ready for a journey that will leave viewers both intrigued and disturbed.
Come on a journey of a thousand miles in just one step. Behold brilliant Bryce gawk dumbfoundedly at his screen without saying anything video clip after video clip. Understand why his mother wanted him on pharmaceuticals. Appreciate why the principal had to insist he be homeschooled. Gain knowledge of why this is the only job he can do. Send money so he can buy more soda in aluminum cans.
$100 Gift Card Raffle: Join the Live. Drop a comment (LiveComments). Like the video. And subscribe to enter. 🤙Good luck. 🍀 Winners will be announced on Friday's video for both raffles. Thanks for tuning in! Don’t forget to smash that like button and subscribe to keep up with the latest video. #scary#nightmare#tiktok#banned
Need more? Check out my TikTok Playlist, or Videos Homepage for the rest of the episodes. Help me buy a grammar book to learn how make these good. Have a great day, everyone. Peace out, my jiggas!
✌️😎 - BryceIsRite
(No copyright infringement intended. Not associated with "The Price is Right." Please don't sue.)
Creepy and scary TikToks that might wake you up and change your reality (reaction, Pt. 12)
(LayedBakDFR) April 14, 2024: Please note that the content featured on this channel may not be suitable for all viewers. Viewer discretion is advised. Some videos may contain mature or sensitive material. Please be aware that this channel is intended for viewers who are 18 years of age and older. If you are not of legal age, we recommend that you seek parental guidance or supervision while watching. By watching and engaging with this content, you acknowledge and accept these age restrictions. Thank you for understanding and supporting. Enjoy the channel. #firesquad
Debunking the science explanation for the cause of the Aurora borealis, which was already brought into question when seen on the wrong side of the globe planet (since the excuse of an explanation for such northern lights is that the sun above us (Surya, Sol) is shooting plasma (cluster of high energy particles) that hits the Arctic Circle above the magnetic North Pole.
Plasma wouldn't skip the center and somehow back up to hit the Antarctic above a South Pole.
When other models of the world we live in are looked at -- ancient Buddhist cosmology, which aligns more or less with Hindu and Jain views and is not so different from Christian (biblical), Norse, Jewish, and Muslim views, all of which controvert science. We hope science is true, we hope the other views are "creation myths" and "origin story storytelling."
High above Los Angeles on Mt. Wilson
But Zetetic science -- the testable, demonstrable, reproducible results, ground up, just the observable facts not theory chasing -- says otherwise.
Now, tonight, people everywhere can see that we have been deceived by NASA ("never a straight answer") and other allied agencies not daring to contradict what the world power says.
What is this ancient map of Earth showing?
See the daring maverick Eric Dubay (ericdubay.com), Samuel Rowbotham, and John Lear's revelations going against the stream of propaganda and official narrative to cause a movement of questioning, checking the facts, and debunking the lies we have been fed for decades.
COMMENTS
(PurRationl) You guys can't be serious. You don't love Science? Science is our mother, nurturer, we have to obey her. You need to obey. What are you guys, nutburgers? Don't say FE, that's communist and gay, purely BS. And its for stupid ppl. that don't know S. SO I think Ive proved my point. Retract this crap and stay in your lane, talking about budda. How would you like a rock thru your window?
(JackLaLn) Yall had me goin for a minute. No way, theyre are not 100 proofs. thts a conspiracy theory for retardeds, learn calculus and get laid. Or play football, earht is ball. love it or leav e it, were spinning fast, peace out
Northern lights LIVE: Auroras illuminate night sky in Canada, USA | Solar Storm News
(CNBC-TV) Started streaming 5/12/24: CANADA. There are northern lights over Minnesota as a strong solar storm is hitting Earth, producing them in many areas across the USA.
A series of solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) have created dazzling auroras that may be seen as far south as Alabama and Northern California but could also disrupt communications on Earth tonight and over the weekend.
Scientists are warning an increase in solar flares and coronal mass ejections from the sun have the potential to disrupt communication on Earth into the weekend.
Solar flares can affect communications and GPS almost immediately because they disrupt Earth’s ionosphere, part of the upper atmosphere.
Energetic particles released by the sun can also disrupt electronics on spacecraft and affect astronauts without proper protection within 20 minutes to several hours.
An unusually strong solar storm hitting Earth could produce northern lights in the U.S. this weekend and potentially disrupt power and communications. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) issued a rare severe geomagnetic storm warning when a solar outburst reached Earth on Friday afternoon, hours sooner than anticipated.
The effects were due to last through the weekend and possibly into next week. The storm could produce northern lights as far south in the U.S. as Alabama and Northern California, according to NOAA.
But it was hard to predict, and experts stressed it would not be the dramatic curtains of color normally associated with the northern lights, but more like splashes of greenish hues.
WARNING: Who is your mother? It is your current mother. The others were past mother so are not your mother. Do not cling even to your current, beneficial, wonderful mother. How much less to the others. Not every daughter will be a mother, but every mother was a daughter. Love your parents. Be grateful. Repay them with Dharma. Or (like, you know, if they were horrible) leave them be. This is what is best for you. Let them be what they will be. You don't own them. They don't own you. Do you owe them? Yes, very likely. If you refuse to repay them, okay then let them be. You are missing out on a rare chance because no ordinary karma is so powerful as what we do to or for our parents. They are like the Buddha for us, so valuable and extra-meaningful is what we do to and for them. That is how karma is. This is part of right view as the Buddha defined it. And because of wrong view, we suffer much. To not suffer, let us have confidence and believe the Buddha. Above all karmas is one karma: making an end of karma. And how do we do that? Awaken, know-and-see, and touch nirvana.
The Buddha's mothers (Mother's Day Special)
(Alan Peto) UNITED STATES. Mother's Day is a popular holiday, but is there a Buddhist equivalent? Did the Buddha ever speak of "mothers"? Yes, often! In addition to past lives, karma (actions) supporting his parents, he helped one of his closest disciples in a practice to help his mother who was reborn as a hungry ghost (preta). This became so popular among laypersons that there is a festival for it. We can also practice loving-kindness, compassion, and generosity for mothers right here and now. These are foundational Buddhist values that are perfect for Mother's Day (and every day).
Is the first video mockery? Whether said in jest or semi-seriously, it is nevertheless profoundly true. How long is samsara? That's easy to answer but, first, What exactly is samsara?
Samsara is the "Endless Cycle of Rebirth," the spinning "Wheel of Life and Death," the "Revolving in the Ocean of Death, Suffering, and Rebirth" because every time one dies, one meets with rebirth -- and this has been going on since the beginningless past and will go on into the unforeseeable future.
Ah, in that case, who knows? A billion years?
Buddhist Mother's Day
(single_cell) Happy Mother's Day to all moms from the Buddha's moms (Maya and Pajapati) to God's wife, Asherah, to Jesus' mom Mary (Miriam) [both at one time or another being called the "Queen of Heaven"], to our mom, Eve of Eden (and the first female in the Agganna Sutta, the "Discourse on Beginnings [of Life on Earth]" (a.k.a. "A Buddhist Genesis") to the progenitor mother in science, also called Eve.
Beautiful Scythians/Shakyians of Central Asia
Hooray for moms! Can we agree that when we first began as a single cell, we were already composed of two halves embedded in a mother (or petri dish), cared for by a mother (or lab workers), and someone somewhere was a father, participating or not. Parents are very important because parenthood is karma. We are fortunate in having parents, but this fortune is not for nothing. We, too, have been mothers.
And samsara is so long, has been going on for so many billions of years and far longer than that, for aeons (kalpa) without discernible beginning, which is not to say there was no beginning but only to say that no beginning is apparent or sensible to our logic and assumptions about its nature. What is the nature of an answer that would fit the question? It must satisfy the question based on our other assumptions. So if we ask, "When did it all begin?" we are in no way prepared for the real answer. We're only hitting our head against a paradox of our own making.
Li'l Piggy, what do you think you're doing?
Here, behold, the magic of instruction: I will answer the age-old conundrum as an example. Think outside of the box (or be boxed in by your thinking), "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" There really is an answer.
It's a wonder more people don't know. So why isn't there an answer? There is no answer because we hold hard and fast to our assumptions, definitions, and categories. Nature is not that way, but we are. The mind builds a cell then wonders why it is trapped in a cell.
Of course, the answer is obvious when someone explains it. So why isn't it obvious before someone explains it? There is an answer, I say.
But, first, let's look at why there is no answer. See, a chicken by definition is a creature born from an egg, and an egg is something laid by a chicken. Mother Chicken, who was herself born of an egg, gives birth to eggs, and eggs hatch into Baby Chickens, and those chickens lay eggs, and those eggs give rise to chickens that lay eggs, ad infinitum.
Are we in Bizarro World, Mom?
The circle, which was not originally closed closes (by definition).
Now there are sufficient factors for it (this cycle of birth and death) to continue, and it cannot (by our simplistic) logic be that there ever was a time that a chicken did not come from an egg and that an egg did not come from a chicken.
Which came first? Obviously, the Mother Chicken who laid the first egg (Baby Chicken) came first. But that doesn't work because, by definition, a "chicken" is something born of an egg, and as the first mother chicken, there is no mother chicken to have given birth to it. Yet, it is born, and it does lay an egg, and that egg does give rise to a Baby Chicken. (Ah, the egg then! But that doesn't either work because, by definition, an egg is something laid by a chicken, which of course it is not, but that's what our definition says. Ah, then, correction, "What came first, the chicken or the (chicken-) egg?"
We're vegans, and we know. We are; we don't.
The solution, which is ultimately true but temporarily unsatisfying, is self-evidently that what came first was the "proto-chicken," that motherly creature not born of an egg that laid an egg:
There once was an egg from a creature, and the characteristics of the contents of that egg's DNA were what we would call a "chicken," which some could argue means the egg came first because out of it comes the first "real chicken," but its mother is a proto-chicken (not a "chicken" because, by definition, it was not born of an egg).
If the egg came first, where did it come from? Eggs, we know, come not only come from chickens. There are other kinds of eggs, countless other kinds of eggs (ova). The egg was nothing new; the "chicken" was.
A creature arose, let's say from a live birth, spontaneously (opapātika) [literally, "accidentally" (upapāta) as we would say in modern genetics and biology but not really accidentally, not without precursor, not without karmic foundation, but in a sense by chance because it was not ordained, fated, and determined by intelligent design as such].
Or say it was designed through trial and error by some "higher" being or beings (what we might call "God" or "gods" because they are so advanced they can play with something as subtle as DNA, which nowadays is a low bar for the definition of a deity, divinity, or higher power).
For, by this token, my neighbor's son is "God." How so? He has a CRSPR machine by which he makes novel beings that live and give birth to similar but not identical things, new creatures not literal clones. The machine doesn't work by itself, so it is not "God." The child does not work well with DNA without that machine, so it is not "God," but together they invest each other with the power to create. And wielding such power, they are "creators," and as such (by our low bar), that kid is a "creator-God" or at least a "god," one of many gods on this very scientifically-minded block with everyone's kids doing bedroom biology and garage-lab tinkering.
Saying that a "God" or "god" did it does nothing to solve the logical problem of where that deity or higher power came from. If that god can be allowed to stand without cause or condition, without precursor or previous condition, then there is no need to trace back the cause or condition of anything. It might all just exist without precursor, which is not the case as we can see. And the Buddha told us what causes "God" (Maha Brahma) and "gods" (brahmas) and godlings/angels (devas) and humans (manussya); it's karma, which karma in particular is (for the superhuman worlds):
(The secret to higher rebirths is heavy good karma, and this is done by gaining, developing, and mastering the jhanas, the source of exalted rebirths on higher planes if not used as the basis for insight and liberation from all rebirth and all suffering. See the 31 Planes of Existence).
Now, for my next trick, I'd like to tell you how samsara, though it began, has no sensible beginning. It is not certain that it is beginningless only that the beginning is so far back and so unsatisfying, no matter how true it is, that no one is satisfied to hear it. We want it said with authority so we can rest faith in it and not have to further think about it. (Well, that's out. Read the Kalama Sutra).
This is an enso, a Japanese Zen circle or zero.
Here's another magic trick. There's no reason to ask about the beginning of it all (of this interminable samsara) because it does not have any edifying meaning. If it did, the Buddha would have said. Because it did not, the Buddha left it undeclared. Our reading is that translations treat "there is no beginning" and "no beginning is found" as synonymous when they are not. To say definitively, "There is no beginning" is declaring what the Buddha wisely left unanswered. There is a beginning [but I won't tell you]" is also not declared. To say the Buddha left something undeclared is to say he made no definitive statement on the matter other than to say it is not edifying, it is not spiritual. It is only philosophical and endlessly debatable. The monk Ven. Malunkyaputta asked him many such questions, which the Buddha left unanswered even when asked pointedly by this monk who was threatening to quit the monastic order. The Buddha reminded him that he was free to quit and only wanted to know, "Did I say if you join the Sangha, I will declare and answer these things?" Of course, he had not. So the Buddha was under no obligation. Moreover, he pointed out to him the worthlessness of such questions (met with in many texts). So we won't asked either, right? We're modern people, more sophisticated, more in control of ourselves than this direct disciple of the Buddha. No, of course we'll ask! We're curious. It's common to want to know. It's a sign of our ignorance and lack of confidence in the Buddha. He both knew the answer and he knew that it was not edifying, was not beneficial to pursue these questions. So I'll answer it what the Buddha would not by only saying this as an example of why it is not beneficial to know.
Q: When did this cycle (samsara) begin?
A: Imagine, for example, a teacher takes a marker to a markerboard and draws many overlapping circles (as seen above). Now, I ask you, "Where did this circle begin?" It's not broken, it's not open; it's overlapping, circle on top of circle on top of ongoing circle. Of course, the real answer is, "I don't know; I wasn't paying attention. I didn't know what it was going to be or that I would be asked." Okay, fair enough. So you ask me, "Where did it begin?" And I leave that undeclared. Am I saying, "I don't know?" No, I know. I know exactly. I was paying attention. This is my example. I knew where it was going.
So then, because I don't answer, you start forming theories and logical deductions with scant evidence and lots of speculation: "Ah, it must have begun at hand level. No, at the top. No, it must have been on the right because the Maker is righthanded. No, the left, because the Maker knew we would ask! No, I don't know! Where did it begin, where did it begin? I must know! [Because if I knew, then I'd be getting somewhere philosophically! And if you call yourself a spiritual teacher or omniscient or in-the-know, you must tell me or I'll quit this conversation]" Where would you get by know?
I know you would not get anywhere worth going. Why? It is because nothing comes of it. It actually won't make a difference if it start here, here, or there. Why? It is because this is a cycle, so once it begins and completes one loop, one place is as good as another: It began everywhere (which it didn't), it began nowhere (which is not true). It did have a definitive beginning point, but what does it matter? It makes no change, no difference. You're asking those question AND meanwhile you're not asking what should be asked, what would pay off, what is of benefit, what cures, what solves, what ends suffering?
Oh, what questions are those? I didn't know there were better questions to ask. Yes, I'm suffering in ignorance here and I would like to get enlightened and be free of further suffering, and if there are "philosophical" questions I can ask that would lead to that happy liberation, what are those?
Those questions, according to the Buddha, are: What is suffering? What is the cause of suffering? What is the end of suffering? What is the way to the end of suffering? Those are good and beneficial questions to ask because they lead to nobility (the Aryan state = enlightenment = awakening = bodhi and nirvana, knowing, seeing, and the end of all suffering). Stop wasting time of philosophizing and start using time on stilling the mind and cultivating insight.
"Yeah, okay, but just between us, Where did it begin?" You mean the markerboard revolutions the teacher has kept drawing all this time? "Yeah." What does it matter? "I just want to know." You mean you don't mind wasting time and looking in all the wrong places for answers? "Huh?" You should be asking four questions, and you're asking none of them. You should not be asking pointless, harmful, nonprofitable questions, yet that's all you keep asking. "Oh. Right." It really doesn't matter because it isn't going to change anything about the problem we're in, the disease we're suffering from to know. Such questions are wrong-minded. Do what is profitable. Ask what is of value to find out. "What's that?" The four question that lead to exploring the Four Noble (Ennobling) Truths. These four lead to the noble state of the noble ones, the enlightened ones, the awakened ones, the liberated ones, the arhats who have done what was to be done. "I'm still not sure it doesn't matter where all of this began." Of course, but if you knew, then what? Where would you be? A. You wouldn't believe. B. You wouldn't comprehend. C. It wouldn't make you one iota freer when you could have been free and enlightened and look into it with that mind.
This is the same problem when people ask about nirvana, imagining that nirvana has to mean "nothingness" because Mahayana Buddhism seems to call it "emptiness." That is not what is being said, not what it is being called in such precious texts as The Heart Sutra. ALL things are impermanent, unsatisfactory, and empty (not self). That is true. Therefore, is it true of nirvana? The answer is no. Why? It is no because nirvana is not a "thing." Everything else is a thing, but nirvana is the unconditioned, the deathless, the end of suffering, the peaceful, the ultimate. It is not a state, not a place, not a noun. Nor is it useful to ask what it is. Experience it, and you will see that all of these questions about it were misled, and all answers would be potentially misleading and missing the mark. It is far better to strive to experience it rather than conceive of it or try to imbue it with qualities and concrete. The Buddha gave those saying it is the undying, the unborn, unbecome, where there is no foothold, no sun, no moon, no light, no dark (no opposites really), four elements. If anyone then foolishly concludes from this that it must be total annihilation, total nonexistence, total nothingness, then one is completely wrong and has done or said something very harmful. Evidence that it is not those things is easy to see because nirvana is not for the afterlife. It is for here and now. A noble one (from stream-enterers to arhats, the Buddha and other samma-sam-buddhas and pacceka-buddhas) experiences it in this very life and may experience it countless times. Experiencing it even once leads to a change of lineage from ordinary uninstructed worldling to noble one. The least of the noble ones has put a limit on suffering for the first time in all of samsara, which has gone on for so very long. How long? Long enough to become weary, disillusioned, dispassionate, long enough to let go and be free of all suffering.
We ourselves have to know-and-see and then we need no authority. With our enlightenment comes an end to any need for a teacher of enlightenment. We may still need that exact teacher to teach is many things, but not enlightenment once we ourselves know-and-see that.
The Buddha's fully enlightened disciples still came to him, still listened to him, still took his advice, still learned from him, but one thing they did not need was further instructions on reaching the further shore to safety, to awakening to reality, to peace, freedom, and complete liberation. To awaken (bodhi) is to directly experience freedom (nirvana), which are together called "liberation" (moksha).
So let us go back to the beginning: "How long is samsara?" When the Buddha was asked this, he explained that it is not easy to say, "so many years, so many decades, or millennia," not even "so many eras, epochs, and ages," or so many minor-aeons (cula-kalpas) or great-aeons (maha-kalpas) or periods of world-contraction or periods of world-expansion or period of chaos in between."
One aeon is just so staggering a duration, a length or measure of time, that one can hardly even fathom one, much less the countless there have been. In all that mass of time there has been samsara, this unending rolling on of time. Throughout that time, we have been reborn, often (but not always) through parents. There is something, very common on other planes of existence yet extremely uncommon here called "spontaneous" births, that is, birth without the mediation of parents. Even then, we might have parents who, while not having given birth to us, are associated with us through karma, who help and guide, and treat us as their own. To be reborn in one of the many heavens in Buddhist cosmology comes this way, but ghosts (petas), light beings (devas), hellions (narakas), "demons," a kind of deva spontaneously born as an asura (titan), yakkha (ogre), naga (mighty beast, sometimes reptilian like a dragon or dinosaur, lizard or serpent, or otherwise just a very powerful being like an elephant, celestial creature, good entity, water-dwelling leviathan, behemoth, or sea creature) and many others are reborn spontaneously.
So to answer the Buddha pointed out an extraordinary thing about samsara, to emphasize how long it has been. He said, much as these beautiful actresses go about in the video saying because at the very beginning they are almost quoting the Buddha exactly, that this beginningless process of empty samsara has been going on so long -- with so many beings in so many worlds in the 10,000 directions of space -- that it is now rare to ever meet anyone who has not already played every role: who has not already been our mother, father, brother, sister, and so on. It's mind-boggling, but that is how long samsara is. The number of beings at any given moment in this whole universe or multiverse may be limited, but the length of time samsara rolls is not limited. It has already been going on for so long... How long? Long enough to grow dispassionate, to become disillusioned, to [stop falling for its tricks and] let go already.
But why don't we? We keep falling for its offers, for its hope, for its con: that with the next wish, we will be fulfilled, that with the next life, we will be satisfied, that with the next wish, we will be forever satiated, that with just one more wish fulfilled, we will be full. We will not. It is an abyss. There is no fulfillment in it. To be satisfied, one must let go and get off the carousel. How? We're addicted!
That is what the Ennobling Eightfold Path is for. That is what reflection on the Four Ennobling Truths does. (Noble = Aryan = enlightened). The Noble Ones know. And how did this go from this shore so full of the dangers of samsara to that further shore of safety and freedom from those dangers, from Samsara to Nirvana? They systematically settled their minds through stillness (the "four absorptions" of samadhi known as the first four jhanas) and took up the practice of insight by contemplating the four topics of mindfulness (body, feelings, mind, and mind-objects) defined in the Maha Satipatthana Sutta or the "Fourfold Setting Up of Mindfulness Discourse" (traditionally called the "Great Four Foundations of Mindfulness Discourse").
Samsara has been going on for so long that in his final rebirth, the "Awakened One" (the Buddha) actually had three mothers. This is because his biological mother passed away a week after his birth, her sister (also married to the same man) raised him, and another woman living east of them and now very aged remembered him. The Buddha was once traveling by foot as he often did through the Kingdom of Magadha or another similar territory in what is now north India [which at that time was an assortment of great territorial holdings or mahajanapadas, kingdoms, republics, cities, and rival "countries" only later fused or reunited into an empire by the Buddhist Emperor Asoka, which later became what we call India today, which in the pre-Buddhist past may have been Great Bharat; that is hard to say because Buddhism is so very old, going back aeons under different buddhas of the past, with life on this continent, planet, or "island" (dipa) going back millions of years, but that's a different story in Buddhist cosmology]. An old couple sees him and calls him "son," and the Buddha does not resist or correct them, which confuses his fellow wandering ascetics who know his mother, the first Buddhist nun, Queen Pajapati (Mahapajapati Gotami). The old woman and man tell him how much they have missed him, ask him why he has waited so long to come to visit, ask him why he hasn't been in touch. This is all shocking to those around him. Later the Buddha explains that that couple for "500" (a number that should never be taken literally because it is figurative for "many") past lives, they were his parents. That woman has been his mother so many times in the past that she feels utterly entitled to still regard him as her son, and he feels indebted to all of their past efforts on his behalf that the Buddha allows her to rightly address him as son. He repays them by teaching them the Dharma that leads to bliss and the end of all suffering. Sadly, she is not named in the sutra, only being referred to as Mata ("Mother"). It is likely that we have such "mothers" though very unlikely that any of them are with us right now in this life as the Buddha's two mothers were simultaneously present for him. Even his two biological mothers, Maya and her sister Pajapati, did not overlap for very long.
Single_cell, May 13, 2012; Alan Peto, May 7, 2022; Dhr. Seven (text), Ashley Wells (ed.), Wisdom Quarterly
What must the god-like extraterrestrials flying around on vmanas think of our dirty Earth?
Fake CGI of "Earth" with faker "Moon" (NASA)
‘Super Earth’ (Kepler-442b) could be more habitable than our own planet, Junky Earth, scientists discover. White men in white lab coats say there is a better planet over there in that part of the galaxy, way better than this smoking dumpster fire of a polluted plane. (Yes, it's more likely a plane than a planet evidence-wise; never mind the rhetoric).
I'll move us or kill us all trying: spaceX
Elon Musk must be right. (The government that backs him can't let him be wrong. SpaceX must succeed and Neuralink, too. They didn't let him take the title "richest man in the world" for nothing).
Musk said he'd build rockets and eventually get us off this trash heap and onto a New Earth. (Maybe this is what Oprah-boosted Eckhart Tolle actually meant?)
It's time we could spread our wings and got on with the colonizing of this solar system, galaxy, and universe (as if that hasn't already happened. It has. That's why we're here. We are not from this Earth, just more sort of naturalized arrivals).
Come into the woods to visit us, Ladies. We have been put here on this prison planet.
.
Founder Jen Kruse
Men are so predictable, even boogeymen. Jen Kruse was told by a seasoned cryptid researcher that she would have better luck with an all-female crew that included no males, no dogs, and no guns. These creatures can smell from miles away. And what do they like the smell of? Women. In that sense they're not so different from Al Pacino. Kruse recruited women but not just any women. She got psychic sensitives with intuition and the ability to remote view, abilities she has. The results were successful: She Squatchers.
Bigfoot compilation, eyewitness commentary
(Adam K. Made Me Watch This!) April 24, 2024: BLUE RIDGE.
This Sasquatch research compilation is of purported cryptid evidence with eyewitnesses Rich Germeau and Mike Wooley. Viewers are treated to more video and audio evidence than expected. Thumbnail cover photo by Harvey Pratt (harveypratt.com). To purchase David Paulides' Missing 411 books that feature Harvey Pratt Bigfoot sketches, see hancockhouse.com.
SheSquatchers.com came together thanks to Native American Jen Kruse. In 2015 she decided to begin an "all-female Bigfoot experiment" as the Midwest's first all-female Bigfoot research team.
Kruse founded the team after receiving a suggestion from cryptozoologist Loren Coleman, who shared his idea. The successful recipe for interacting with Sasquatch creatures is to send only females into the woods without men, dogs, or guns.
She-Squatchers is more women in the woods. Members are psychic women, utilizing extrasensory perception in the search. Team leader Jen Kruse is a missing persons psychic medium and remote viewer. Her female teammates, Jena Grover and Tammy Treichel, are also gifted intuitives as well as adventurous woodswomen. They have gone through scary and amazing experiences, collecting evidence along the way. The team is based in Minnesota but travels coast to coast, searching for Bigfoot and sharing what they have found.
Such footage is not allowed to. Bad evidence that can be debunked are promoted to discredit the whole process. Bigfoot hunters do not control the algorithm. Who does? They are the "they" to ask. Of course, they'll only say, "It's impersonal, based on an algorithm, pure data" that no one tampers with? You bet it gets tampered with all of the time. What else would be the use of it for them to control the narrative and public opinion? It's a common misconception that IF any such footage were any good, why wouldn’t it be famous yet? It’s a logical fallacy. Thinking that the best footage would be “advertised” or advanced by science or by a journalist working for the system is silly. It is in their best interest to keep everyone in the dark.
US gov't just released terrifying Bigfoot photos
(Eternity) May 3, 2024: For centuries, tales of Bigfoot have captivated the imaginations of people around the world. From the dense forests of North America to the remote mountains of Asia's Himalayas, reports of encounters with these elusive creatures have persisted, shrouded in speculation and lore.
Bigfoot photos were sanctioned by the authorities who try to deny the existence of the mysterious creature. But many are certain government holds secrets about Bigfoot they've kept hidden from us.
Join Eternity to uncover the truth behind some of the most shocking Bigfoot photos that were leaked by the government.
Meet Mark Dorth, a Bigfoot investigator from Ohio who's been on the hunt for Sasquatch for the past 30 years. During his quest, he's gathered a collection of evidence, including footprints, audio recordings, and even had a firsthand encounter that sparked his research.
Legend has it that while exploring an old strip mine in search of badger dens, Dorth was followed out by something that soon revealed itself to be a towering, bipedal, hairy creature. The thought of an 8-foot tall, hairy beast roaming the woods gives the shivers, let alone encountering one in a cave unexpectedly.
Rich Germeau interview • Encounter at Lonesome Creek: Rich's...
Mike Wooley YouTube source (I cannot find original source for this) so sharing the link where I got it from)
• Mike Wooley’s Terrifying Bigfoot Enco...
Josh Highcliff Mississippi Skunk Ape Footage • Wasatch Mountain Washington State • Sasquatch Traversing Deep Snow near W...
MK Davis White Bigfoot Running • MK Davis talks about the white Bigfoot...
2014 Xmas Northern Minnesota • Bigfoot Encounter on Christmas 2014 Thinkerthunker analysis of N Minnesota Sasquatch • Christmas Bigfoot Giant - 13 feet Tall?...
Belle Valley Pennsylvania a Sasquatch Analysis by Bigfoot Tony • Bigfoot sighting in Belle Valley PA -...
Belle Valley Original • Possible Bigfoot Sighting in Belle Va...
Mk Davis Whiteys Run • M.K. Davis has new photos from the Whi...
Cliff Barackman Brown Footage
http://cliffbarackman.com/research/fi...
Belle Valley 2013 Bigfoot Tony • Bigfoot sighting in Belle Valley PA -...
Mississippi Skunk Ape • Mississippi Skunk Ape Part 1, THE TOOL.
Russian Jumping Yeti • The Jumping Yeti from Russia video - ...
Top 15s, Top 15 Most Convincing Bigfoot Sightings Caught on Tape, 2017; Jen Kruse (shesquatchers.com) on Coast to Coast AM; Seth Auberon, Pfc. Sandoval, Pat Macpherson (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
All materials on this site are submitted by editors and readers. All images, unless otherwise noted, were taken from the Internet and are assumed to be in the public domain.
In the event that there is still a problem, issue, or error with copyrighted material, the break of the copyright is unintentional and noncommercial, and the material will be removed immediately upon presented proof.
Contact us by submitting a comment marked "private."
Do not follow this journal if you are under vinaya or parental restrictions. Secure protection by Sucuri.
Wisdom Quarterly: American Buddhist Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at creativecommons.org/about/licenses.
.jpg)
